You are here:
Home alpKnowhow Publications Measuring for Decision Making: Soft and Hard Use of Indicators in Regional Development Policies
Navigation
 

Measuring for Decision Making: Soft and Hard Use of Indicators in Regional Development Policies


Author F. Barca, M. Brezzi, F. Terribile, F. Utili
Public Investment Evaluation Unit - Department for Development and Cohesion Policies – Ministry of Economy and Finance
Year
January 2005
Region
In the territorial limits of the Alpine Convention.
Country
it (Italy)
Type of publication
reviewed
Other
http://www.dps.mef.gov.it/materialiuval
Topics
  • Policies and instruments

Abstract
In the Italian Community Support Framework 2000-2006 comparable information sets at territorial level have been built to evaluate the territorial dimension of economic and social trends and to assess the quality of policy action, allowing to re-introduce in regional development policies the recursive sequence objectives/policy instruments/data. Nevertheless, due to incomplete information, policy objectives are difficult to translate into quantitative, verifiable measures; furthermore, it is very hard to establish the causality link between actions and objectives. The paper describes two Italian initiatives adopted in the use of indicators in regional development policies, where different approaches are required, according to the relevance of the two problems. In the first case, a set of territorial indicators – denominated “context indicators”, was chosen to describe final objectives; these are aimed at a soft use: better targeting policy actions, within a decision process involving both private and public actors, and broadly assessing their effectiveness. In the second case, where policy is aiming at explicit targets in terms of institution building, a hard use of indicators was adopted, conditioning financial sanctions and rewards to the attainment of quantified targets; in this case a “knowledge revealing mechanism”, based on partnership and interim monitoring, had to be establish, by which indicators were more clearly specified during policy implementation. The paper describes the strength and weakness of both systems of indicators and some lessons are drawn.
Most relevant parts of the publication
all

Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: