An alternative land use planning procedure was conducted with two ways of involving inhabitants (opinion survey and workshops), which resulted in an alternative, generally acceptable location for the production zone.
Project executive
Komenda municipality, Department for spatial planning
Participants
Local authorities (Major, Department for spatial planning),
Komenda inhabitants,
Biotechnical Faculty (Department for landscape architecture).
Objectives
Development of local agriculture development strategy
Development and verification of advanced participation process and tools
Activities
Public opinion survey, workshops with interactive land use computer modeling, development of alternative land use plan proposal
Process
Department for landscape architecture of Biotechnical faculty ways invited by local authorities from Komenda to develop an agricultural plan for the Municipality. However the ambitions were higher, although from a academic perspective. In the first step an opinion survey was conducted, which included all the main aspects of Komenda future and its spatial development and protection. The statistically representative sample was included in the poll. Based on the survey results, several alternative models for development were prepared, which were then tested and adjusted in a sequence of interactive workshops with inhabitants. These workshops were open to everybody, and were supported by hands on GIS computer modeling.
Results
The process provided the required strategy of agriculture development and also found an alternative site to a highly controversial proposal, made by “official” group who were preparing the new land use plan. The proposed site was much more acceptable to all stakeholders, however later also became problematic because the program has been changed (expanded 10 times, from local to regional scale, with changed types of allowed technologies).